Financial risk and compliance, reviewed the way an auditor would
For businesses that need more than an accountant's sign-off — board-ready findings, scored and dated, aligned to ISO 19011 evidence principles.
From our review caseload
A running tally of findings, closures and scores across every compliance review we've run since 2019.
What a review changes, in numbers
Median outcomes across clients who complete both the initial review and the 90-day verification.
| Metric | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Open FICA/FSCA findings | 7 (average, first review) | 1 (average, 90-day verification) |
| Days sales outstanding | 58 days | 41 days |
| Supplier concentration (top supplier % of spend) | 41% | 27% |
| Composite risk score (out of 100) | 62 (moderate-high) | 31 (low) |
Compliance review, answered
The questions boards and finance leads ask us most before commissioning a review.
Scope & Standards
No. It sits alongside it. Where a statutory audit is required, we bring in our IRBA-registered panel auditors separately, with clearly separated scope and fees.
The five core criteria stay constant; weightings shift by sector as shown on our home page methodology section, and one or two sector-specific sub-criteria are added where relevant (e.g. FICA exposure for financial services).
Process & Reporting
Whoever you nominate — typically the board, the FD, or a designated compliance officer. We do not distribute findings beyond that list without written instruction.
Between 2 and 6 weeks depending on entity count and finding volume, with the 90-day verification review scheduled separately.
Get your composite risk score
Most businesses are surprised by their first score — usually in a useful way.